On Mar 7, 2007, at 12:17 PM, John Siracusa wrote:

> On 3/7/07, Michael Reece <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> this was causing me problems (always getting counts of 1) because my
>> DBI abstraction layer re-implements fetchrow_array, only ever
>> returning a list.
>
> Well there's your problem :)

indeed!


>> "[...] For these reasons you should exercise some caution if you use
>> fetchrow_array in a scalar context."
>>
>> [...] the last sentence does provide a warning, so perhaps you can be
>> convinced to change RDBOM line 1500 to
>>
>>         ($count) = $sth->fetchrow_array;
>
> In this case, I know that I'm only ever fetching one column
> (COUNT(*)), so there's no ambiguity.  I admit no wrongdoing; I'm
> following the letter of the DBI spec! :)  But I'll change it just for
> you... ;)
>
> (in SVN)
> -John

thanks!



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to