On 5/16/07 12:51 AM, Jeffrey Horn wrote:
> __PACKAGE__->meta->setup(
>     table   => 'foo',
> 
>     columns => [
>         foo_id           => { type => 'bigint', not_null => 1 },
>         nullable_int     => { type => 'bigint' },
>         nullable_varchar => { type => 'varchar', length => 10 },
>     ],
> 
>     primary_key_columns => [ 'foo_id' ],
> );
> 
> __PACKAGE__->meta->initialize(replace_existing => 1);

I'm not sure why that meta->initialize() call is there (leftover from
copy/paste of larger code sample?), but just FYI, it's not necessary.

> It seems that my Foo RDBO is returning 0 for $foo->nullable_int instead of
> the expected undef.  Did something change on this new version or is this a
> bug?

It's a bug.  The fix is now in SVN and will go out to CPAN in the next
release.  Thanks for the report.

-John



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to