On 18 May 2007, at 21:41, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
[snip]
> Since nobody else agreed with Marvin, I'd add my two cents that I do
> think it'd be nice if the tutorial jumped "straight to the
> meat" (says the vegetarian...).   When I started looking at RDBO I at
> least subconsciously found it intimidating that "just getting
> started" was so much trouble^W reading.
>
> Or maybe you are right that we just need a separate "quick start"
> document.  :-)
[snip]

I'll third that suggestion for a quick start doc being nice.

This might be an artefact of the kind of applications I've been  
playing with but the vast majority of my time I spend with the kind  
of code that doesn't come until "Auto-initialization and the  
convention manager" onwards.

In the applications I've been writing I find myself writing very  
little RDBO related code - because RDBO is just so darn excellent at  
doing all the work for me.   When I first skimmed the tutorial I  
didn't get that message.

A quick start along the lines of "Here's a database schema. Here's  
RDBO::Loader.. Bish bosh. Job done. Oh yes, when you need some more  
flexibility, better validation, etc. here's where to look" would be  
nice.

(Please note: This suggestion carries no karmic weight since I do not  
plan to submit a patch - so feel free to ignore - especially since  
I've had writing a decent intro to Test::Class on my to do list  
for... ohh... about five years now :-)

Cheers,

Adrian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to