A typo in the name of one primary key column is silently
ignored even though no such column exists in the list of
table columns.

The impact:

  When given a set of columns which are children of
  another object via a one-to-many relationship, only
  only one element is inserted.  After being inserted,
  it is updated for each additional child.

Should not Rose::DB::Object complain at some point during
setup or perhaps on first use of the class when a listed
primary key column is missing from the list of columns ?

- philip


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to