A typo in the name of one primary key column is silently ignored even though no such column exists in the list of table columns.
The impact: When given a set of columns which are children of another object via a one-to-many relationship, only only one element is inserted. After being inserted, it is updated for each additional child. Should not Rose::DB::Object complain at some point during setup or perhaps on first use of the class when a listed primary key column is missing from the list of columns ? - philip ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object