thanks for the fast reply.
i think the issue was this;
before strip() made it to svn/REL, i had my own version which didn't
kill child objects.
when strip() made it into trunk, i didn't do a compat check. stupid me.
soon i'll have an army of perl coders to check this sort of stuff for
me...
On Aug 11, 2007, at 9:08 PM, John Siracusa wrote:
> On 8/11/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> so let me rephrase this question:
>> i thought strip() wasn't supposed to remove fkeys/rels ?
>> it seems
>> to be doing so in .765
>
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/Rose-DB-Object/lib/Rose/DB/Object/
> Helpers.pm#strip
>
> "By default, the db object and all sub-objects (foreign keys or
> relationships) are removed."
>
> You want something like this:
>
> $o->strip(leave => 'related_objects');
>
> or maybe:
>
> $o->strip(leave => [ 'db', 'related_objects' ]);
>
> -John
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a
> browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Rose-db-object mailing list
> Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
