Quoting John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> explicit_null > > That's closer, but it feels like even less of a complete description > than undef_sets_null. >
Perhaps it should involve 'default' somehow? undef_ignores_default or something? adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
