I just installed Rose 2001a for Unix and am having a few problems. 1) When I reverse engineer code into my model, method signatures and attributes are showing up with the fully qualified classpath for classes in the class diagram. For example foo(var1 : com.sun.classes.A) is being generated. In 2001, I did not have problems reversing code/generating code. And, I did not get the fully qualified classnames appearing in my method signatures and attributes. It there anyway to turn this off? 2) Also, My model has a different Logical View than Component View. When I generate code, I am getting warning that classes cannot be resolved, even when they are in the same package. With the new version does Rose try to resolve the path to a class using the Logical View Packaging or the Component View Packaging (Path specified in classpath setting)? I NEED to maintain two different views. Thanks in advance with these questions. -- Frank Figueroa eServices Software Engineering (303) 272-9143 x79143 Sun Microsystems, Inc. ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject:<BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum * *************************************************************************
