> So the only solution is to derive the plugin from our code base, therefore > to first port it on Windows and Mac. That's not trivial either, and would > require a Qt license on Windows. Then, as I said, you'd be faced with the > choice of either extracting only the parts you need from RG in order to > make a reader, or to port the whole thing.
I would have thought that the extracting of the parts you needed ( i.e. the "view" ) would have been doable from a OO design standpoint.. but ... you know the code certainly... Thats why I felt brave enough to suggest it anyhow. And in any situation, Qt would be a bad solution and something like XUL or somesuch might be better. I was hoping ( from what little of the source code I've been able to glance over ) that the basic structure of the RG file format and perhaps even some of the rendering techniques could be adapted to work... > Oh, and NS doesn't existing anymore, so to be of any relevance it would > have to be an IE plugin. Again, I'm not very good at anything, but I DO know the Mozilla plugin structure does work. And Konqueror uses the nsplugin method to suck Mozilla plugins ( ala flash ). So, even getting a plugin that works on, say Mozilla Firebird, would be wonderful, imho. Firebird is such a better browser anyhow. :-) -- Dan Ostrowski ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
