On Wednesday 04 August 2004 04:49 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: > Anyway, this is all pretty circular. There are arguments on either side, > and we can rehearse them forever. I'm not, in fact, particularly opposed > to the idea of wikis or of having one for Rosegarden; I just started > arguing about it because most of the wikis I've seen have been useless. > That of course, as you know and say, doesn't mean they have to be. But I > do think the concept is not as self-evidently brilliant as some seem to > think.
FWIW, I hate wikis, and the concept. I'm not even going to bother trying to justify that. I just don't want you feeling like you're the only one. Taste and all that. I don't do real-time chats, web fora, or blogs either. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
