On Friday 29 October 2004 10:15 am, Mark Hymers wrote: > On Thu, 28, Oct, 2004 at 09:30:38PM -0400, Silvan spoke thus.. > > > Of course nothing is stopping me from creating custom colors, but I still > > feel pretty strongly that it would be more reasonable just to offer a > > selection of colors with neutral, generic names. > > Fair enough. If nobody objects, I'll post a patch to change this soon. > (I don't want to just commit having been away for a long time and > knowing that you're getting ready for 1.0).
Did I correctly surmise in my earlier post that this change would only involve fiddling with the stock autoload.rg file? If that is indeed the case, then I wouldn't be too worried about committing the change. If not, what else is involved? You can always post the patch to the list for review if you're worried about breaking something. > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1039599&group_id=4932&ati > I'll try and have a look at it this weekend. I'd appreciate that. I realize it's not a very helpful report. I've never been able to figure out how I keep painting myself into that same corner. Something borked somewhere though. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
