On Wednesday 29 June 2005 22:44, Silvan wrote: > On Wednesday 29 June 2005 02:36 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > > look too bad. (And about a thousand times better than it did, and > > > maybe no worse than 1.0 at that.) > > > > Thanks. Do you think it's good enough to be released ? :-) > > Having just looked at the old canvas again, I'm afraid I can't recommend > it. > > Bottom line here is a simple comparison test.
Just a sanity check : have you tried with output redirected to /dev/null. The new code prints a whole lot more traces while scrolling. That said, after getting the segment to travel back and forth throughout the whole compostion, movement does become very jerky. I suspect some resource leak or something. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
