On Wednesday 06 July 2005 04:52, Silvan wrote: > > Oh, right. Well, bleah then, my graphic performance truly sucks, doesn't > it?
That, and your CPU performance sucks too. It really surprises me that a .4 GHz difference would translate into a 4x speed difference on non-graphic routines. > One thing Chris said in a private message to me, which I didn't see show up > here... It did, I got it too. > He asked if we had compared compiler optimizations. That's a good > point. I've got this in the script I source when building: > > export CXXFLAGS='-g3 -O0 -gstabs+3' I just have '-g'. I'll try adding '-O0' to see if that makes a difference (I don't remember what's the default -O value). -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
