On Wednesday 16 November 2005 08:38 am, Chris Cannam wrote: > If you look at the two pages I linked, they certainly do appear to know > that Rosegarden has the higher web traffic. What puzzles me is that the > statistics they display all say Rosegarden is the more active by miles, but > the ranking still says the opposite.
Both projects are a total flatline for "Web Traffic" as they appear here, but RG is clearly hugely ahead in the other three boxes. It was initially misleading because the two sets of graphs are scaled differently. I have no explanation. I've paid vague attention to this statistic over the years, and it always seems nonsensical. We get a top ranking at a time when everybody is on vacation, and a low ranking when the code, list and tracker discussions are flying fast and furious. Go figure. Incidentally, the white-on-white boxes you complained about show up as the attachment here. This is Konqueror on the left and Firefox on the right. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
here.png
Description: PNG image
