OK, I see what I was failing to understand about this before.  Having a 
working GUI to look at certainly helps, quite apart from anything else.  
Maybe it's a good thing I haven't actually been following the 
discussion!

This looks like good stuff, anyway.  I still want to get my head around 
what exactly is being controlled here, so here we go.

These parameters are purely a set of default values for some other 
parameters of a segment.  Right?

Earlier you wrote,
> However [...] the instrument is still not a suitable place to put
> these, because even when an instrument can belong to individual
> segments, it will not belong to segments that do not yet exist
> unless it belongs to the track. 

If we have per-segment instruments, we'll still need a per-track 
instrument (to be the default for new segments on that track).  So that 
part doesn't make much difference.  And if we have a per-track 
instrument, then that instrument does affect all segments that haven't 
yet been created on that track.

However, both instrument parameters and track parameters (apart from the 
new ones you're adding -- by "track parameters" I'm referring to the 
first couple of things Pedro stuck in the track parameter box) both 
affect segments that have already been created as well.  What you're 
doing is really a different category of thing than either -- it's a set 
of defaults for a set of segment parameters.

Given that this differs from both existing track and instrument 
parameters, it doesn't make much difference (functionally) whether the 
set of defaults is associated with the track or the instrument: in 
either case the behaviour (acting only to prototype new segments 
created on that track or using that instrument) is the same, and is 
different from the behaviour of the previously existing track or 
instrument parameters (which control properties of the existing 
segments on that track or instrument as well as of new ones).

The choice of whether to associate this stuff with track or instrument, 
therefore, should probably be down to where the user would expect to 
find them, rather than any particular functional meaning.

Either way, these "defaults for segment parameters" will presumably need 
some associated actual segment parameters.  For example, if you can set 
the default colour for a segment, you also have to have a colour 
parameter in each segment so that you have something to set, and in 
case you want to change it later.  Similarly, the highest and lowest 
pitch are presumably going to end up being stored in the segment.  What 
happens if you set the playable range on a new segment, and then decide 
to change it later?  Or if you simply want to be able to _see_ what 
playable range is in effect on a particular segment?  Or you want to 
copy the segment to another instrument (using "instrument" in the sense 
of "oboe or French horn or whatever" rather than Rosegarden MIDI 
instrument) that has a different range?  If the parameters in this box 
are just defaults for some segment parameters, then they'll also have 
to be present in the segment parameter box so that you can review and 
change them.

I realise that you also said something about how making it possible for 
these things to change for already existing segments would lead to 
madness, but I guess I don't quite see how it works to make it 
impossible for them to change, either.

Of course if they can be changed after the fact, then maybe they should 
behave more like traditional instrument parameters after all.

I realise your heart is probably sinking or your ire rising as I'm going 
over some circular route that you've already argued back and forth 
repeatedly, but please indulge this train of thought if you can...


Chris


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to