On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For historical, or traditional, or something reasons we don't make any > use of Qt at all in the base directory. I think we should probably > keep it that way, unless for some reason we come to a general decision > to port base to Qt. Mixing the paradigms (no Qt in base, except for > this one class) would not be a good thing, I think.
OK, I expected that... that's why I asked :-) I'll think over a different design (I may have no other choice anyway, since what I've done so far seems flawed -- probably by design). Thanks for this useful feedback. -- Best regards, Philippe. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
