Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 11:25:48, Chris Cannam a écrit : > > What happens to the linked copies if you delete the original segment? > Currently one of the linked copies (the first one in the list) is promoted to reference segment.
> I assumed that Ian's "peer-to-peer" approach was intended to avoid the > problem of having the user keep track of which one was supposed to be > the original and having to treat it specially. That seemed like an > attractive feature to me. My first aborted attempt to get segments linked was using an asymmetric scheme. I was even thinking to remove all the linked segments if the original one was deleted. So Ian's approach surprised me first, but certainly it's may be what most users want. > > But I can see that, if you do it that way, you don't get to use the > structure in situations where there really _is_ a master segment > involved, i.e. where you have a segment followed by a number of > repeats that are implemented as links. > The modified Ian's implementation should be both asymmetric and peer-to-peer. Asymetric for the developer's needs and peer-to-peer from the user's point of view. Yves ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
