Yes, RIPE NCC should personally approve every person's router configurations. Please get started on that right away.
Leslie Sent from the road while on tour On Oct 8, 2016 14:04, "Ronald F. Guilmette" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Online records seem to suggest that the bogus unregistered AS47860 > is and always was just a property of the one and only entity that > is providing it with route distribution, i.e. AS43659, D2 International > Investment Ukraine, Ltd. > > http://1whois.ru/world/UA/%D0%9A%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2/LLC%20%22Albino%22 > (Note the abuse email address.) > > Note that AS43659, D2 International Investment Ukraine, Ltd. is itself > an authorized RIPE NCC LIR: > > https://www.ripe.net/membership/indices/data/ua.d2investukraine.html > > I have already written to that organization via the following two > email addresses and I have received no reply: > > [email protected], [email protected] > > Could someone who actually speaks Ukranian please email these crooks and > ask them nicely to stop passing routes for unregistered IPv4 space? > > > Regards, > rfg > > > P.S. Looking over this document: > > https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-640 > > It appears to me to be the case that it is possible to become a full > fledged dues-paying RIPE NCC LIR member while having never made any > sort of pledge whatsoever to refrain from announcing routes to IP space > for which the member has no clear rights, either directly, from the > relevant RIR, or indirectly from that actual registrant. Is that > correct? > > Forgive me. Even after all this time, I'm still trying to wrap my > head around this charade, this farce. RIPE NCC makes, creates, and > provides allocations, but then never formally asks any of its members > to respect or obey any of those. Is that about the size of it? > >
