Dear Routing WG, dear authors of 2019-08 "SLURM file for Unallocated and
Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space",

after the previous Review phase (v2 of the proposal) didn't reach
consensus in April I asked the authors whether they would like to withdraw
the proposal or come up with a new one.

A new proposal "SLURM file for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address
Space" was written and a new Review phase started on the 25th of May 2020,
we had a few messages on the mailinglist in reply to that. This phase
ended on June 23.

I have concluded that no rough consensus has been reached this time either
as raised concerns have not been addressed, and judging by the sometimes
fierce opposition
I doubt that we will reach consensus with a few small changes to the
proposal and a new Review phase - and therefore I have decided to withdraw
the proposal.

Kind regards,

Paul Hoogsteder
RIPE Routing WG co-chair

> Dear colleagues,
>
> Policy proposal 2019-08, “SLURM file for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE
> NCC Address Space", is now in the Review Phase.
>
> The proposal aims for the RIPE NCC to publish a SLURM file (Simplified
> Local Internet Number Resource Management with the RPKI), containing
> assertions with the origin “AS0” for all unallocated and unassigned
> address space under our control.
>
> The proposal has been updated following the last round of discussion.
> Version 3 of the proposal has moved from instructing the RIPE NCC to
> create ROAs to creating a SLURM file for use with Relying
> Parties/Validators.
>
> The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this latest proposal
> version to support the community’s discussion.
>
> You can find the proposal and impact analysis at:
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-08
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-08#impact-analysis
>
> And the draft documents at:
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-08/draft
>
> As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four
> week Review Phase is to continue discussion of the proposal, taking the
> impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE
> Policy Document.
>
> At the end of the Review Phase, the working group chairs will determine
> whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to
> provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input
> from the previous phase.
>
> We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document
> and send any comments to <[email protected]> before 23 June 2020.
>
> Kind regards,
> --
> Petrit Hasani
> Policy Officer
> RIPE NCC
>
>
>
>
>
>



Reply via email to