Hi Paul, With all the respect, the community deserves the right to understand your decision based on a summary. This is not written on the PDP, but is a well-known practice, at least in other WGs and the RIPE-710 doesn't forbid doing that summary.
On the other side, I'm happy to start an appeal, but it is much easier to, if the actual authors confirm that they aren't going to appeal or re-send a new proposal, myself, or another set of authors, prepare it. Following the RIPE-710, this right CAN'T BE DENIED, as Gert has confirmed yesterday. Having a summary that really justify the decision may provide a better perspective one way or the other. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 9/7/20 15:52, "routing-wg en nombre de Paul Hoogsteder" <[email protected] en nombre de [email protected]> escribió: Hello Jordi, RIPE-710 describes the appeals process. Kind regards, Paul Hoogsteder. > Hi all, > > I must insist here. What is the balance between opposition and support, > following RFC7282, for this specific proposal. Can we have a summary of > the inputs? > > I *could* (once we have the summary) agree that may be there is no > consensus yet, but that is not a sufficient reason to withdraw a proposal. > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > El 9/7/20 15:29, "routing-wg en nombre de Petrit Hasani" > <[email protected] en nombre de [email protected]> escribió: > > Dear colleagues, > > The policy proposal 2019-08, "SLURM file for Unallocated and > Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space" has been withdrawn. > > This proposal aimed for the RIPE NCC to publish a SLURM file > (Simplified Local Internet Number Resource Management with the RPKI), > containing assertions with the origin âAS0â for all unallocated > and unassigned address space under our control. > > The proposal is archived and can be found at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/archived-policy-proposals/archive-policy-proposals/ > > Reason for withdrawal: > The WG Chair felt that raised concerns remained unaddressed and that > there was a strong opposition against the proposal in the community. > > Kind regards, > -- > Petrit Hasani > Policy Officer > RIPE NCC > > > > > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of > the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or > use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this > communication and delete it. > > > > > > ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
