> On 11 Oct 2021, at 12:45, Matthew Walster <matt...@walster.org> wrote: > > I genuinely don't understand the reason for obstruction here, what am I > missing? Perhaps this sentence could have made clear that I am not 'obstructing': "In that context, I am not against BGPSec as such, there are just things that I would like to see first." In any case, I know it's not my decision to make. Feedback was asked. I gave my 2cts
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Matthew Walster
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Randy Bush
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Erik Bais
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Marco Marzetti
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Job Snijders via routing-wg
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Nathalie Trenaman
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Matthew Walster
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Matthew Walster
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Randy Bush
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Andrei Robachevsky
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Randy Bush
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Matthew Walster
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Randy Bush
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Antonio Prado via routing-wg
- Re: [routing-wg] Ad... Job Snijders via routing-wg
- [routing-wg] Add BGPsec support to Hosted RPK... Booth, Mike via routing-wg