JB wrote on Tuesday, November 14, 2023 9:22 AM CET: > See my discussion with Markus. TL;DR:
Does that help? > It reads to me a bit like Markus' response, that (paraphrasing) we > shouldn't be trying to improve something that isn't working as well > as it could, and just implement hacks to work around it. Did I? My point - and I'll stick with it until I'm taught better: Improvements (often) do not justify breaking existing rules. Or in this particular case: Adding members-exclude to as-set without defining it somewhere "officially" (syntax and semantic) BEFORE, seems to me NOT the right way. (Esp., as the target is to get this into the complete IRR "eco system" and not just into RIPE.) Markus -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/routing-wg
