Arjan van Staalduijnen wrote: >I don't know what the patch implies, because I don't use git... If the >pathc is about 301 or 302 status redirects then I'd have my doubts about >the patch. If I am not mistaken this behaviour is likely to be a
It's about an internal redirect (within Roxen).
External redirects should be (and are) handled differently.
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
Every successful person has had failures but repeated failure is no
guarantee of eventual success.
