Just a note: This list has been broken since a mail server upgrade last Thursday. I've gotten your mails anyway and you've got mine, but the list has not. It should work again now.
"Stephen R. van den Berg" <[email protected]> wrote: > Martin Stjernholm wrote: >>I'm sure it's excellent, but unfortunately I don't have the time to >>get acquanted with it enough to vouch for an inclusion in the standard >>dist. > > Understandably. BTW, there is a reason why there not a lot of comments > in that code; I don't want to make it easier than necessary for a spammer > trying to understand what we're doing here. > >>Imho it'd make a fine third-party module. I guess the reason you've >>patched it into vform.pike is to add it to the internal tag set of the >><vform> tag. > > Correct. It lets it be a local tag to vform, and allows testing for > failure using the vform-conditionals. > >> It could be possible to hook it in there even from a >>separate module. Or if it isn't, I'm more likely to accept a patch >>that makes that tag set extensible in some way. > > I'll look into this, eventually. > >>Btw, your latest patch list is marked in my mail box, but I haven't >>gotten that far through it yet.. > > BTW, when you eventually get to looking at the strain, please be sure to > resync with the BuGless branch, because since my last mail enumerating > the patches, I have updated some of them (essential updates). Roger. I guess that means I should look for a later BuGless.mast* branch.
