> One last thing: documentation for classes can get pretty long. Is there a > way to @include extra files? Steve Lianoglou had this idea.That's another interesting idea. We currently have @template, which is a superset of @include, but it might be worthwhile differentiating them semantically. Where would you imagine such include files living? Would they be R files or plain text to be interpreted as roxygen comments? (We decided on R files for templates so that existing syntax highlighting code would work) There may be a use-case for @including Roxygen comments, but I think my use-case would benefit more from pure Rd that would just be concatenated into the resulting Rd file. These would be things like extra \section{}s. Maybe make that more explicit with a @section that refers to a file?
In roxygen (v1) existing Rd files in the Rd directory are merged with the documentation generated by roxygen based on the file name and @rdname. Maybe we can implement something similar in roxygen2? Would that help? Manuel. _______________________________________________ Roxygen-devel mailing list Roxygen-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/roxygen-devel
