On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 11:51, Daniel Rall wrote: > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 15:58, John Wilson wrote: > > > I have been looking at the performance of the latest version of the Apache > >> XML-RPC system when transferring 1Mb byte arrays via base64 encoding. That > >> is to say I have been running the TestBase64 benchmark. > >> > >> On my test system (Sun 1.3 JVM on Win2K) here the "old Helma" XML-RPC system > >> runs the TestBase64 benchmark (from the current CVS tree) in ~54 seconds. > >> The latest version from CVS runs the same benchmark in ~77 seconds. I have > >> replaced the Base64 implementation with a version of the Base64 > >> encode/decoding from MinML-RPC and tidied up the interfacing of this to the > >> rest of the code (avoiding converting from StringBuffer to String, returning > >> a char array rather than a byte array and the consequential changes). This > >> now runs the benchmark in ~26 seconds. > >> > >> Are you interested in having these patches? > > > > Definitely. I know you've been on the helma mailing lists and have > > always helped out, that you are very familiar with XmlRpc in general > > (MinML-RPC) so I'd say you're more than capable of applying your patches > > directly. > > > > I would like to nominate John for commit access. > > > > +1 > > > > Maybe we could combine the code bases somehow? > > +1, but please post diffs to the list the first few times so that Jon > can tear them apart, uh, I mean, code review them. ;-) > > Jason, since you nominated, would you take care of the karma request > and apache.org account (John doesn't appear to be an Apache commiter > yet)?
Taken care of, thanks. > - Dan -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org
