dlr 2002/12/04 15:21:46
Modified: xdocs client.xml
Log:
A patch from Ed Tellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"...XmlRpcClient seems to be about twice as fast as
XmlRpcClientLite. Perhaps the documentation could be modified to
indicate that you should try both and use the one that works best in
your environment."
Revision Changes Path
1.4 +9 -4 xml-rpc/xdocs/client.xml
Index: client.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-rpc/xdocs/client.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- client.xml 7 Nov 2001 12:46:34 -0000 1.3
+++ client.xml 4 Dec 2002 23:21:46 -0000 1.4
@@ -17,10 +17,15 @@
the standard Java API</li>
<li><a
href="/xmlrpc/apidocs/org/apache//xmlrpc/XmlRpcClientLite.html">org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClientLite</a>
provides its own lightweight
HTTP client implementation.</li></ul>
- <p>XmlRpcClientLite is usually faster, but if you need full HTTP support
- (e.g. Proxies, Redirect etc), you should use XmlRpcClient.Both client
- classes provide the same interface, which includes
- methods for synchronous and asynchronous calls.
+
+ <p>If you need full HTTP support (e.g. Proxies, Redirect etc),
+ you should use XmlRpcClient. If you don't need full HTTP
+ support and are concerned about performance, you should
+ experiment with both XmlRpcClient and XmlRpcClientLite. On some
+ platforms XmlRpcClient may be faster, while on others
+ XmlRpcClientLite may be faster. Both client classes provide the
+ same interface, which includes methods for synchronous and
+ asynchronous calls.
</p>
</section>
<section name="Synchronous XML-RPC Calls">
