DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15216>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15216

de/serialization independence

           Summary: de/serialization independence
           Product: XML-RPC
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Enhancement
          Priority: Other
         Component: Source
        AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


For serialization (object->XML) can XmlWriter be made public?

For deserialization (XML->object) can the ContentHandler be separated from 
XmlRpc, allowing it to be used as an independent SAX handler, with no thread or 
SaxDriver discovery code inside?  Support for SAX2 DefaultHandler would be nice 
too, but not critical.

Use case: where XML-RPC is being used with an alternative transport (JXTA 
pipes, e.g.) this separation would allow for much cleaner client 
implementations, where these modules can be used for preparing requests and 
parsing responses.

Much appreciated!

Reed Esau, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://xmlrpc.jxta.org

Reply via email to