Ryan, I've yet to take a hard look at what is in the CVS head, I'm deep in DSP code right now, I should have time to move up the target/host communications layer of my current project in about a month. I'll give you concrete specific feedback when I have some.
Regards John Volkar (ps: I'm really hating TI's Code Composer Studio right now. <sigh/>) -----Original Message----- From: Ryan Hoegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: xml-rpc John, Your use case, like Rufios and like mine to a lesser extent, seems to support the abstraction of the transport layer. Just as Rufio's particular case raised some interesting issues (transporting XML rather than bytes) I'm sure yours might as well. To what degree have you looked into the changes that would be necessary to use RS-232 or something in place of HTTP in cvs HEAD? I'd be curious to get your take on how the abstraction should be accomplished. -- Ryan Hoegg ISIS Networks http://www.isisnetworks.net Volkar, John wrote: >Rufio, > >I *am* using the Apache XML-RPC on the host side of the communications >channel. I've got mixed communication channels sometimes the Host == >Server and Target == Client, sometimes reversed, sometimes both. > >I'll be following the Apache XML-RPC run-up to 2.0 and follow the CVS >head, as I think that I'll stick with java and apache XML-RPC on my >host hardware. > > >Thanks, >John Volkar > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
