> Robert,
>
>
> Thanks for the heads-up - I checked the spec at xmlrpc.com and you are
> indeed correct.
>
> I wonder if it would be a good idea to be able to set an option to force
> responses containing Strings to explicitly state the data type, to help
> out client libraries that are not working yet to spec?
>

You may want to contact the people who wrote the offending client libraries
and let them know that their implementation does not fully satisfy the
specification.  It seems like a really big issue considering that the xmlrpc
spec is so simple itself ;)  It also doesn't seem like it would be that
difficult for them to fix.

Eric Westfall

Reply via email to