>Does the directory name mean you're seeing the segfault with version
>0.7 of rpcemu, or is this actually an SVN working directory?

It's the latest from svn.

I'll try to make a minimal ROM image that reproduces the fault (in my view 
rpcemu shouldn't segfault for any reason, even if given illegal ARM code to 
execute).

-- 
Ed Avis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu

Reply via email to