2008/12/20 Theo Markettos <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:51:32PM +0100, Gillian Seed wrote: >> James Woodcock and I are currently working on the HostFS part of >> RPCEmu: implementing multiple discs support and add additional >> features like free/used space and showfree. > > BUT, would it actually make sense to have the same name as other emulators? > There's no way you're going to run two HostFS implementations at once. That > means you can share host filing system trees between, say, RPCEmu and VRPC > if the RISC OS path doesn't change. Or maybe this is too tricky to get > right?
I'm not sure whether it is possible, but we could use a separate name for the FS (required, due to our registration with ROL/ROOL) and still allow alternatives, such as HostFS, via a setting? I'm not sure how hard it would be to accomplish this, but this would give us the best of both worlds: We have an official registration and we still have the possibility to use existing VRPC directory trees... -- Greetingz Kees _______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
