On 14 Oct, David Pitt <[email protected]> wrote: > list <[email protected]> wrote: > > How does RPCEmu on XP or linux compare with Virtual RiscPC on XP? > > Aps I'm interested in running are Pluto/POPStar email fetching, > > ProCAD+ and OvationPro. and I'll want to network by cable to the > > Iyonix. > [...] Perhaps the most significant difference between VRPC and rpcemu is > networking connectivity. rpcemu on Linux can be made to network and see > the internet,
Thanks. That's a very important difference for me, to go online in rpcemu. I could get a linux machine and run my RISC OS apps on rpcemu. Anyone here have any real world experience using RISC OS apps on linux rpcemu? Would rpcemu/linux connect with Iyonix via the router/modem? Is a 1GHz EeePC with the N280 chip too little? > [...] VRPC's interconnectivity is very good, ShareFS does the business > with the Iyonix, that taken with VRPC's ability to mount directories on > the host machine makes VRPC a useful bridge between RISC OS and the > various host OSes. > It is as ever horses for courses but just to maintain balance rpcemu is > a fine achievement that works well, it is under current development and > is not hobbled with software protection. I'm interested. I'd really like to hear from users. Brian _______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
