In article <[email protected]>, Tom Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Therefore, can I please request that the two forks are merged? FWIW As a 'new user' I'd echo a preference for this. It has confused/puzzled me why there are 'two versions' and not knowing what differences there may be. I tried and used the 'non spoon' version before I realised that there was a spoon 'alternative' and I can see this might deter or confuse other newbies like myself. I've just written an article for 'Archive' on using rpcemu (on Linux) and hope to write some more about it in future. I'm intending to write a number of articles that are in the Linux/ROX/rpcemu area with the aim of helping myself and other RO-aware people into making use of them. However writing documents like these can become more complicated if there are mulitiple versions that differ. Above said, the forking was before I was aware of rpcemu so I for all I know there were good reasons of which I am still ignorant. Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scots_Guide/intro/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html _______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
