Hi,
The forwarded email contains a trivial patch sent privately last year to
correct a comment. I don't think it's been applied.
Cheers,
Ralph.
--- Begin Message ---
exporting patch:
# HG changeset patch
# User Ralph Corderoy <[email protected]>
# Date 1254656237 -3600
# Branch trunk
# Node ID f72574e3df9bd554bfdd2e944cc7a61a3e7318cf
# Parent 45c344b22d2e6e77adf043aca1cbc63d232f688d
'addr' is the address to store, not a pointer to it. Correct comment.
diff -r 45c344b22d2e -r f72574e3df9b src/codegen_x86_common.h
--- a/src/codegen_x86_common.h Sun Oct 04 12:13:33 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/codegen_x86_common.h Sun Oct 04 12:37:17 2009 +0100
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
* Store a 32-bit relative address at the current code generation position.
* The offset is calculated relative to the current position.
*
- * @param addr Pointer to the address to be stored relative to current position
+ * @param addr The address to be stored relative to current position
*/
static inline void
addrel32(const void *addr)
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu