Hi,

The forwarded email contains a trivial patch sent privately last year to
correct a comment.  I don't think it's been applied.

Cheers,
Ralph.


--- Begin Message ---
exporting patch:
# HG changeset patch
# User Ralph Corderoy <[email protected]>
# Date 1254656237 -3600
# Branch trunk
# Node ID f72574e3df9bd554bfdd2e944cc7a61a3e7318cf
# Parent  45c344b22d2e6e77adf043aca1cbc63d232f688d
'addr' is the address to store, not a pointer to it.  Correct comment.

diff -r 45c344b22d2e -r f72574e3df9b src/codegen_x86_common.h
--- a/src/codegen_x86_common.h  Sun Oct 04 12:13:33 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/codegen_x86_common.h  Sun Oct 04 12:37:17 2009 +0100
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
  * Store a 32-bit relative address at the current code generation position.
  * The offset is calculated relative to the current position.
  *
- * @param addr Pointer to the address to be stored relative to current position
+ * @param addr The address to be stored relative to current position
  */
 static inline void
 addrel32(const void *addr)

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu

Reply via email to