Hi,
Another patch from last year, updated to today's source.
The test to see if the native hostfs implementation returned with r9
set to 255 to indicate "not implemented" was duplicated. Remove one
of them.
The deleted test isn't required. 255 is >= 0xb0 so hostfs_error is
branched to. The first thing that does is check r0, which now holds the
same as r9, to see if it's 255, branching to not_implemented if so.
Cheers,
Ralph.
diff -r 02cb887ed259 riscos-progs/HostFS/hostfs.s
--- a/riscos-progs/HostFS/hostfs.s Sat May 29 14:15:29 2010 +0100
+++ b/riscos-progs/HostFS/hostfs.s Sat May 29 23:54:29 2010 +0100
@@ -298,9 +298,6 @@ fs_func:
mov r9, #6
swi ArcEm_HostFS
-
- teq r9, #255
- beq not_implemented
cmp r9, #0xb0
movhs r0, r9
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
