Hi altogether,

[snip]
> However with a Viewfinder much larger screen modes became possible.
> 
> One of the main working differences I notice between running rpcemu and my
> *Iyonix* (since I no longer have any real RPCs) is the availability of
> large, 16 million colour, screen modes.

Others have already given replies how to solve this in the current situation.

However, it might be interesting to discuss the long term plans for RPCemu
wrt the graphics situation. Should RPCemu continue to work as a
"hardware emulator", faithfully emulating the Risc PC hardware, or should
it gain features to allow it to evolve into a "RISC OS emulator".

Now that RISC OS 5 is available in source, it would be possible to write
an "Emulator HAL" to achieve optimum performance by tailoring the OS
and the emulator's code to work together. HostFS is already a step in that
direction. Others may involve graphics, sound, memory management,
mouse, keyboard, networking...

I know that Tom is a "hardware emulator" fan who likes to emulate
strange podules and all that. I don't know which direction Matthew and
Peter prefer.

As a developer, I like the "hardware emulator" thing because it eases
testing with various older RISC OS versions on hardware that is
mostly identical to that of potential users.

As a user, I would like to have a "RISC OS emulator" with maximum
performance.

Basically, I want everything and I want it now ;-)

Opinions, anyone?

[snip]

Have fun,
Steffen

_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu

Reply via email to