2014-01-27 George <[email protected]> > Hi David > It would help if you could confirm the version of RPCEmu (0.8.11, > presumably?), RISC OS and Windows you are using. Here I'm using > 0.8.11. Recompiler mode, running 5.20 on Windows7 64-bit, with no > speed problems (ROmark shows approx. 610,000 MIPs). The processor is a > 3.4GHz i7 quad-core. I also have an 1.5GHz Atom-powered XP laptop on > which the same RPCEmu setup gives a ROmark score of 205,000 MIPs > (approx. 115% of a S/ARM RPC, which seems reasonable). >
RPCEmu 0.8.11 RISC OS 5.20 Windows XP SP3 on Intel Atom N230 (first generation) I suspect the use of some non supported x86 instruction, as I did have the same problem under VirtualPC (illegal instruction + very slow recompiler... slower than the interpreter). > > > > NB: I have different software projects, and for me, RPCEmu (or a modified > > version) would be a great way to sell them under Windows. For this kind > of > > use, a simple network (no bridge, so no server applications), would be > > great (no configuration to do). > > Amen to that! But it isn't just a question of configuring RPCEmu, > presumably: as I understand it, before RPCEmu can connect with the > outside world, Windows has to be configured to allow this (i.e, > setting up the network bridge). Automating /that/ procedure for all > the different flavours of Windows would be quite some task, I imagine. > > Yep, but network could also works without a bridge. Of course, it's (a bit) less useful (no server applications). Best regard. -- Mobile : 06 76 67 91 60 Journaliste Silicon.fr & Développeur
_______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
