Hi Colins,
On Mar 15, 2007, at 4:10 PM, Colin Alston wrote:
Hytham EL Nakhal wrote:
Hi Jordi, Vincent, All,
Thank you for your cooperation and wish you could finish the
combined proposal before next AfriNIC-6 meeting, to have time to
discuss it in the list to hammer it out (as Andrew said) in the
next meeting..
I hope no one minds me jumping in here,
It's never too late.
if anything I say has already been mentioned then please forgive
me. I wish to say that I support the policy regarding the provision
of PI assignments.
On the issues of size, a /48 is sufficient for anything which can
be reasonably defined as an "end-site" and as far as I know is in
line with original IETF assignment policies on the matter.
As for slack space for growing a range, this is a difficult issue
but I think it is one which is a matter of assignment logistics and
not assignment policy.
Perhaps the provision of a /44 per /48 should be determined by the
intended use of the block.
I agree with you and I think we should leave this to the RIR
(AfriNIC) to determine when making the assignment.
-v
The issue is what kinds of end-sites will want PI pool space at
this time - these will in most cases be large organisations who can
not yet negotiate an upstream assignment.
--
Colin Alston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ______
Software Developer, Linux & Internet Services /\_\_\_\
Thusa Business Support (Pty) Ltd /\/\_\_\_\
http://www.thusa.co.za/ /\/\/\_\_\_\
Tel: (+27) 031 277 1257 \/\/\/_/_/_/
Fax: (+27) 031 277 1269 \/\/_/_/_/
\/_/_/_/
"To the world you may be one person, to one person you may be the
world" ~ Rachel Ann Nunes.
_______________________________________________
rpd mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
_______________________________________________
rpd mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
