Hi,
On 14 Mar 2007, at 5:57 PM, Mark J Elkins wrote:
Is this policy for use only by Critical Infrastructure providers?
Who defines what this means?
If its "self-defining" ie - The Organisation multi-homes already
with IPv4 space and plans to do the same with IPv6 space - then I'm
happy with the wording "critical infrastructure" but not with
"provider".
A number of the banks in South Africa do multi-home - I see no
reason not to allow them to be allocated PI IPv6 address space.
There is a good chance that a /48 would not be enough space - but
how could they ever become an LIR? - doesn't sound right. Sure -
they could "allocate to their branches" - but thats watering down
what I see an LIR as being.
Sorry - not trying to pick on or offend anyone.... :-)
Thanks Mark, these are excellent points. I agree.
regards
Alan
---------------------------------------------
Alan Levin
Tel: +27 21 409-7997
_______________________________________________
rpd mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
