> I think so. In principle our policies are not made for individuals > accessing those resources, unless clearly justified (and in this case I > think a good justification is to be an organization). > > Otherwise one of the missions of the RIRs, the adequate management of > address space (not a wasteful one), is not fulfilled.
The question is: Do we think, the proposed criteria are good for what we intend to do with this policy ? If the answer is "no" and the solution is "be an organization", then let add * "Must be an organization" So, if a "individual" meet the initial assignments criteria, he will need to become an organization to qualify. > Please, think in the implications in terms of routing table if just a 10% > of the individuals in the world are able to get this resource. Is not only > about the addressing space, which probably could perfectly cope with that > for 100% of the world population if using /48, but what about the routing > slots ? Are you willing to pay then for a 10 times more expensive router in > your network (you will not have other chance, you are being forced to that > if the routing table grows at that point). > > We need a balance here. I suspect that, we will need a definition of "organization" including size. And are we not meeting folks against this policy here ? --alain Let us keep think simple and move forward. --alain _______________________________________________ rpd mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
