> The proposal suggest that this (AfriNIC) RIR do it for this region, and the > same for each one of the other RIRs.
ack. > I guess it may happen that the NRO could decide, if the proposal goes thru > all the regions to implement a central registry instead of 5 "distributed" > central registries for this purpose, The draft proposes a unique central authority, which differs from your proposal. > but I guess this is out of the scope > of the proposal, and could be a "next step". I'm not sure if this could > work, but I can imagine that if we reach consensus in every region, it may > made sense to have a single registry, if it reduces the cost, and this > being funded by the NRO common funds. > > I believe there has not been a similar case before. > > Anyway, as said, the proposal here is to talk about the *AfriNIC* scope, at > least at this stage. > > The draft is expired, but as you know can be revived at any time, just with > a new submission. The goal is to do so, in parallel with the advancement of > the PDP in the different regions. The important think here is also to > realize that the space is already allocated to IANA by RFC4193. RFC4193 only defines L=1 IETF does not define yet L=0, and i guess we need L=0 defines before we move forward. --alain _______________________________________________ rpd mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
