N=1 is a good value
On 10/2/07, Hisham R Rojoa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear Colleagues and Members > > The value of N is not set in this policy proposal. > As discussed during the Public Policy Meeting it was agreed to ask the > community what the value of N should be. > At the face to face meeting, the value of N=1 & N=2 had the highest and > same > number of votes; i.e. 6. The other values of N had no votes. > > We would appreciate if the community could indicate what their preference > is > for the value of N before the end of the last call. > > Best Regards > Hisham > > _____________________________________________ > From: Hisham R Rojoa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 October 2007 10:43 > To: 'AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List' > Subject: Last call for comments for Global Policy for the Allocation of > the > Remaining IPv4 Address Space > > > Dear Colleagues and Members > > The Global Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address Space > reached consensus at our last meeting in Durban, South Africa. > As per our Policy Development Process, this policy is now in the last call > for comments phase. > This phase will end on the 17th of October 2008. > > More details about the policy can be found at: > http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/afpol-v4gp200707.htm > > Best Regards > > Hisham > > > _______________________________________________ > rpd mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd >
_______________________________________________ rpd mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
