At 05:50 15-04-2009, Vincent Ngundi wrote:
Policy proposal : IPv6 Allocations to Non-Profit Networks
Proposal Date : 13 Jan 2009
Scope : Regional proposal
afpol-v6200901
<<http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/afpol-v6200901.htm>http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/afpol-v6200901.htm>
Summary:
This policy seeks to make it as easy as possible for non-profit
entities to obtain a /48 PI IPv6 addressing resources from AfriNIC
and drive the deployment of and demand for IPv6 services through
this in Africa.
The Definitions section has an "(a)" only.
The definition mentions legal responsibility within a country or
region. I suggest removing "region" as ths proposed policy is for
local geographical areas only.
Does the organisation have to justify the need for the IPv6 address space?
The abstract mentions a membership category. There is no mention of
that or what fee structure is applicable in the text that follows.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
rpd mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
