SM wrote: > Your proposal specifies that a LIR can be allocated a /23 (IPv4 maximum > allocation size) and four additional /23. My question is about whether > the aggregate allocation (one + four) will allow equitable distribution > of IPv4 addresses among LIRs.
This brings me to another of the reasons for having a range of possible allocation sizes. If an LIR knows that they will need 4x /23 then I would much prefer that we allocate them 1 x /21 and not 4 fragments of address space. The routing table size has been clearly identified is a looming problem for the global internet. Let is not fragment the IP space any more than we have to. -- Graham Beneke Apolix Internet Services E-Mail/MSN/Jabber: [email protected] Skype: grbeneke VoIP: 087-750-5696 Cell: 082-432-1873 http://www.apolix.co.za/ _______________________________________________ rpd mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
