SM wrote: > Hi Frank, > At 02:33 02-10-2009, Frank Habicht wrote: >> But apart from "critical infrastructure" there might maybe (or maybe i'm >> dreaming) come new technologies about that can enable a new&better >> transition mechanism and require a few IPv4 addresses. I think intention > > Do you mean something like Carrier Grade NATs? There may be a business > case for that if we are viewing the problem only in terms of IP addressing.
That wouldn't be "new&better" to me, but subject to discussion. That's why I would postpone that whole discussion to that last moment when it is known what technologies are available _then_ and which "deserve" to get a piece of the last /12 of IPv4 of AfriNIC. Frank _______________________________________________ rpd mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
