Hi Vincent,
At 03:23 19-03-10, Vincent Ngundi wrote:
Below please find a summary of the discussions on the above policy proposal:
I have some concerns about this summary.
· There is no room for the community to
relieve the PDP-MG of duty if they are not performing to expectations.
I am not sure what you mean by the above. I
haven't seen any discussions about this.
· The existing policy talks about a
Board of Trustees but AfriNIC doesn't have one,
it instead has a Board of Directors.
That's a mistake that was made when you wrote AFPUB-2008-GEN-001.
2. Some discussants raised issues with the
authors claim to be 'creating' a policy
development process in the region as one does
exist. If indeed this proposal aims to address
the lapses in a current policy, it should be
framed as such rather than how it is currently
put - an attempt to reinvent the wheel. The
proposed change in the names of the policy
mailing list and working group were seen as superficial.
This provides a one-sided view.
I didn't see anyone stating that the proposed
change in the names was superficial.
3. Key differences between the proposal and
the existing policy as explained by the author are as follows:
· Any member of the community can be a
part of the Policy Development Working Group
while currently the PDP-MG is limited to three people.
The above could be misread as the context is not provided.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
_______________________________________________
rpd mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
