Hi Sent from my iPhone
> On 3 Jun 2021, at 22:24, Patrick Okui <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 3 Jun 2021, at 21:18 EAT, Carlos M. Martinez wrote: > > So, IMO, ROV (either rejecting invalids or doing what you think is > appropriate) is a distinct operation from creating ROAs and I believe that at > this point in time every resource holder should be creating their ROAs, but > implementing ROV is something that it might or might not make sense to a > particular network. > > Agreed, which is why I said “in general”. Security researchers for example > may want to ignore “valids” and mostly concentrate on “invalids”. > > However, if in general my ROAs do not result in a decent possibility that a > hijack will be dropped (until I go kicking and screaming) then I have less > incentive to create them. This is the chicken and egg issue I’ve faced when > preaching ROA generation. > I fully agree here. I mean, what is the essence of creating ROAs if no one is using them to stop propagating hijacks? > > -- > patrick > > _______________________________________________ > RPKI-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpki-discuss
_______________________________________________ RPKI-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpki-discuss
