On Wed, Jun 27, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> [...]
>> In rpmdb/ the various Berkeley-DB utilities db_xxx are rebuild for
>> installation purposes, although they got already built in db3/. As the
>> utility object list is already incomplete (the building just still
>> worked as librpm.la is linked in which contains all(!) Berkeley-DB
>> objects anyway) and we don't need a second building of the tools,
>> replace the building with simple symlinking. Also sort the utilities
>> the
>> same way in the _PROGRAMS list and in the targets list.
>
> This isn't the right fix. The system db (and utilities) may be different
> than the db (and utilities) used by rpm. It's the linkage against
> -lrpmdb that is important imho.
Yes, I know. But nothing has changed here. The installed db_xxx
utilities are _still_ those built against RPM's internal Berkeley-DB. I
just install the ones in db3/ and not the re-linked ones in rpmdb/. But
as librpmdb contained just copies of the objects from db3/ the effective
resulting db_xxx tools are exactly the same.
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org
Developer Communication List rpm-devel@rpm5.org
