On Tue, Jul 17, 2007, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> > Without automated testing, and without binary, de facto demonstrable
> > testing, I think adoption of rpm-5.0 will take quite a while.
>
> So what can we do to automate testing? Given the ability
> to pull down a fresh binary rpm, or build from a fresh
> tarball, what constitutes a functional/regression test?
According to Jeff we should nuke test/ and get test-harness working
out-of-the-box again. Then one can use this for a more in-depth test of
RPM 5...
Is anybody willing to get test-harness running out-of-the-box through a
simple "make check"?
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org
Developer Communication List rpm-devel@rpm5.org
