On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > type of solution. Does that work for you? > > In general I'm ok with an approach which punishes only > old/obsolete/deprecated/whatever platforms. But in this case I'm more > thinking about neither distinguishing between old and new and more about > mostly feature based testing: > > #ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H > #include "config.h" > #endif > #if defined(HAVE_STDINT_H) || (defined(__STDC_VERSION__) && > __STDC_VERSION__+0 >= 199901L) #include <stdint.h> > #endif > #if defined(HAVE_INTTYPES_H) > #include <inttypes.h> > #endif This approach works fine for building rpm itself but it doesn't work when you are building external app that doesn't use autoconf and that app includes rpm public headers. > Ralf S. Engelschall > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.engelschall.com -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ______________________________________________________________________ RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org Developer Communication List rpm-devel@rpm5.org
